Ask Singapore Homework?

Upload a photo of a Singapore homework and someone will email you the solution for free.



Question

junior college 1 | H2 Maths
4 Answers Below

Anyone can contribute an answer, even non-tutors.

Answer This Question
111
111

junior college 1 chevron_right H2 Maths chevron_right Singapore

Confuse on how to determine part ii

Date Posted: 2 years ago
Views: 505
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K
2 years ago
We need to use discriminant here.

Horizontal lines do not always cut the graph because the graph does not appear for some values of y. It's like a smiley face graph ending at say y = 4 and a sad face graph ending at say y = -4. Then there is no "graph" between y = -4 and y = 4.

For some values y = k, the graph will not exist. However, for those which the graph does exist, it will only cut the curve at most twice, which is largely similar to how you would solve discriminant questions.

Let k = that fraction for curve C.

Then k (x + r) = x² + px - q.

We will transform this into the form ax² + bx + c = 0, where discriminant < 0 for the "missing" range for the original curve.

Will do this later if no one responds by tonight.

See 4 Answers

done {{ upvoteCount }} Upvotes
clear {{ downvoteCount * -1 }} Downvotes
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K's answer
5997 answers (Tutor Details)
1st
This is for part i which is needed for part ii; I will write workings for part ii later
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K
2 years ago
Alternatively, we can "work backwards" for p and q

x² + px - q = 0 (because y can only equal zero when the numerator is zero but the denominator is non-zero)

From the roots at x = -2 and x = 1,

(x + 2) (x - 1) = 0
x² - x + 2x - 2 = 0
x² + x - 2 = 0

Comparing,
p = 1, q = 2

(note that q = 2 and not q = -2)
done {{ upvoteCount }} Upvotes
clear {{ downvoteCount * -1 }} Downvotes
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K's answer
5997 answers (Tutor Details)
Prelude to the workings for part ii which will come next
done {{ upvoteCount }} Upvotes
clear {{ downvoteCount * -1 }} Downvotes
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K's answer
5997 answers (Tutor Details)
A rough idea goes like this for part ii
done {{ upvoteCount }} Upvotes
clear {{ downvoteCount * -1 }} Downvotes
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K's answer
5997 answers (Tutor Details)
You can tag the points down to the diagram for part (iii) which I have drawn in my "prelude" section earlier.
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K
2 years ago
For part iv, do this:

3x⁴ + 3x³ - 6x² - x - 3 = 0
3x⁴ + 3x³ - 6x² = x + 3
3x² (x² + x - 2) = x + 3

Cross-dividing,
(x² + x - 2) / (x + 3) = 1 / (3x²)

The left-hand side of this equation is your original curve C, while the right-hand side of this equation is the new curve which you will have to draw, i.e.

y = 1 / (3x²)
Eric Nicholas K
Eric Nicholas K
2 years ago
There will only be two intersecting points with the smiley face portion of curve C.

One is close to x = -2, while the other is close to x = 1.25.

There are no intersections with the sad face portion of curve C.

So total, there are two intersections of the two curves, meaning to say that there are exactly two real roots to the equation 3x⁴ + 3x³ - 6x² - x - 3 = 0.

[In reality, there are two other roots, but they are complex/imaginary/non-real roots]