Ainsley's answer to Ainsley's Junior College 2 H3 Maths question.
Last two steps incorrect.
It's m² < 16, not m² > 16.
It's m² < 16, not m² > 16.
is it like this
m² < 16
m > ± 4
Hence -4< m < 4.
m² < 16
m > ± 4
Hence -4< m < 4.
There's no such thing as m > ± 4
If m is already bigger than 4 , there's no need to write it's bigger than -4 because it's alr understood
m² < 16
Notice that m² can be = -m x -m or
m x m
You know 4 x 4 = 16
- 4 x - 4 = 16
So if m² is smaller than 16, then
m has to be smaller than 4 or m is bigger than -4.
(Eg. Let's say m = 3 whereby 3 < 4.
3 x 3 = 9 < 16.
If m = -3, whereby -3 > -4,
-3 x -3 = 9 < 16)
So -4 < m < 4.
If m is already bigger than 4 , there's no need to write it's bigger than -4 because it's alr understood
m² < 16
Notice that m² can be = -m x -m or
m x m
You know 4 x 4 = 16
- 4 x - 4 = 16
So if m² is smaller than 16, then
m has to be smaller than 4 or m is bigger than -4.
(Eg. Let's say m = 3 whereby 3 < 4.
3 x 3 = 9 < 16.
If m = -3, whereby -3 > -4,
-3 x -3 = 9 < 16)
So -4 < m < 4.
The correct way to present this is :
m² - 16 < 0
(m + 4)(m - 4) < 0
-4 < m < 4
m² - 16 < 0
(m + 4)(m - 4) < 0
-4 < m < 4
I see. ......... thank you